美国页岩气体积改造技术现状及对我国的启示

吴奇,  胥云,  刘玉章,  丁云宏,  王晓泉,  王腾飞

downloadPDF
文章导航 > 石油钻采工艺  > 2011 >  33(2): 1-7
吴奇, 胥云, 刘玉章, 丁云宏, 王晓泉, 王腾飞. 美国页岩气体积改造技术现状及对我国的启示[J]. 石油钻采工艺, 2011, 33(2): 1-7.
引用本文: 吴奇, 胥云, 刘玉章, 丁云宏, 王晓泉, 王腾飞. 美国页岩气体积改造技术现状及对我国的启示[J]. 石油钻采工艺, 2011, 33(2): 1-7.
shu
WU Qi, XU Yun, LIU Yuzhang, DING Yunhong, WANG Xiaoquan, WANG Tengfei. The current situation of stimulated reservoir volume for shale in U.S. and its inspiration to China[J]. Oil Drilling & Production Technology, 2011, 33(2): 1-7.
Citation: WU Qi, XU Yun, LIU Yuzhang, DING Yunhong, WANG Xiaoquan, WANG Tengfei. The current situation of stimulated reservoir volume for shale in U.S. and its inspiration to China[J]. Oil Drilling & Production Technology, 2011, 33(2): 1-7.
shu

美国页岩气体积改造技术现状及对我国的启示

  • 1.

    中国石油勘探与生产分公司，北京　100007

  • 2.

    CNPC油气藏改造重点实验室，河北廊坊　065007

  • 3.

    中国石油勘探开发研究院廊坊分院，河北廊坊　065007

详细信息

  • 中图分类号: TE357.12

The current situation of stimulated reservoir volume for shale in U.S. and its inspiration to China

  • 1.

    PetroChina Exploration and Production Company, Beijing 100007, China

  • 2.

    The Stimulation Key Laborotary of Petrochina, Langfang 065007, China

  • 3.

    Langfang Branch of the Research Institute of Exploration and Development, CNPC, Langfang 065007, China

  • 摘要: 概述了美国页岩气改造技术发展历程，对微地震技术推动页岩气改造技术的进步进行了综述，对国外提出的油藏改造体积概念进行了技术定义，分析了体积改造技术的内涵及作用。对实现体积改造的储层条件、天然裂缝的影响及起裂特征等进行了分析，总结出实现体积改造的关键技术以及对我国页岩气改造技术发展的启示。对比了火山岩、碳酸盐岩等天然裂缝发育储层的常规改造与体积改造的不同理念，并提出了页岩气储层改造技术未来发展方向。
    Abstract: This paper briefly illustrates the development process of the Stimulated Reservoir Volume (SRV) for shale gas reservoir in U.S. was briefly illustrated, and how micro-seismic technique drove shale gas reservoir stimulation to develop was given. First, the concept of SRV proposed by abroad is defined technically, and then the connotation and function of SRV technology are analyzed; second, the reservoir conditions, the effect of natural fractures and the characteristic of starting crack are illustrated and then the key points of SRV implementation and its enlightenment to the development of China’s hale gas reservoir stimulation technology is summarized, finally, the differences between conventional stimulation for natural fractured reservoirs such as volcanic rock and carbonate rock and SRV technology are coMPared, and the further development of the SRV for shale gas reservoir is addressed.
  • [1] ［1］阎存章，李鹭光，王炳芳，等，北美地区页岩气勘探开发新进展［M］.北京：石油工业出版社，2009-03.
    ［2］LANCASTER D E, HOLDITCH S A, MCKETTA, et al.
    Reservoir evaluation, completion techniques, and recent results from barnett shale development in the fort worth basin［R］. SPE 24884, 1992.
    ［3］LEE MATHEWS H, GARY Schein, MARK Malone, et al. Stimulation of gas shales: they’ re all the same—right?［R］. SPE 106070, 2007.
    ［4］OMKAR Jaripatke, BILL Grieser, CHONG K K, et al. A completions roadmap to shale-play development: a review of successful approaches toward shale-play stimulation in the last two decades［R］. SPE 130369, 2010.
    ［5］MUTALIK P N, BOB Gibson, TULSA, et al. Case history of sequential and simultaneous fracturing of the barnett shale in parker county［R］. SPE 116124. 2008.
    ［6］VASSILELLIS G D, LI C, SEAGER R, et al. Investigating the expected long-term production performance of shale reservoirs［R］. SPE 138134, 2010.
    ［7］MAXWELL S C, URBANCICT I, STEINSBERGER N, et al. Microseismic imaging of hydraulic fracture complexity in the barnett shal［R］. SPE 77440, 2002.
    ［8］FISHER M K, WRIGHT C A, DAVIDSON B M, et al. Integrating fracture mapping technologies to optimize stimulations in the barnett shale［R］. SPE 77441, 2002.
    ［9］FISHER M K, HEINZE J R, HARRIS C D, et al. Optimizing horizontal completion techniques in the barnett shale using microseismic fracture mapping［R］. SPE 90051, 2004.
    ［10］MAYERHOFER M J, LOLON E P, YOUNGBLOOD J E, et al. Integration of microseismic fracture mapping results with numerical fracture network production modeling in the barnett shale［R］. SPE 102103, 2006.
    ［11］MAXWELL S C, WALTMAN C K,WARPINSKI N R, et al. Imaging seismic deformation induced by hydraulic fracture complexity［R］. SPE 102801, 2006.
    ［12］MAYERHOFER M J, LOLON E P, WARPINSKI N R, et al. What is Stimulated Reservoir Volume（SRV）?［R］. SPE 119890, 2008.
    ［13］CIPOLLA C L, LOLON E P, DZUBIN B.Evaluating stimulation effectiveness in unconventional gas reservoirs［R］. SPE 124843, 2009.
    ［14］CHIPPERFIELDS T, WONG J R, WARNER D S, et al. Shear dilation diagnostics: a new approach for evaluating tight gas stimulation treatments［R］. SPE 106289, 2007.
    ［15］RICK Rickman, MIKE Mullen, ERIK Petre, et al. A practical use of shale petrophysics for stimulation design optimization: all shale plays are not clones of the barnett shale［R］. SPE 115258, 2008.
    ［16］GALE J, HOLDER J. Natural fractures in shales and their importance for gas production［C］. Tectonics Studies Group Annual Meeting, La Roche-en-Ardenne, Belgium, 2008-01.
    ［17］DON Smith, PHILLIP Starr. Method to pump bridge/frac plugs at reduced fluid rate［R］. SPE 112377, 2008．
    ［18］CIPOLLA C L, WARPINSKI N R, MAYERHOFER M J, et al. The relationship between fracture complexity, reservoir properties, and fracture-treatment design［R］. SPE 115769, 2008.
    ［19］NEIL Buffington, JUSTIN Kellner, JAMES G. King, et al. New technology in the bakken play increas the numbe of stages in packer/sleeve completions［R］.SPE 133540, 2010.
    ［20］ZARGARI S, MOHAGHEGH S D. Field development strategies for bakken shale formation［R］. SPE 139032, 2010.
    ［21］张杰，徐安建，李翠楠，等.泥页岩水化对气井钻井井壁稳定性影响规律研究［J］.石油钻采工艺，2008，30（2）：10-12.

    ［1］阎存章，李鹭光，王炳芳，等，北美地区页岩气勘探开发新进展［M］.北京：石油工业出版社，2009-03.
    ［2］LANCASTER D E, HOLDITCH S A, MCKETTA, et al.
    Reservoir evaluation, completion techniques, and recent results from barnett shale development in the fort worth basin［R］. SPE 24884, 1992.
    ［3］LEE MATHEWS H, GARY Schein, MARK Malone, et al. Stimulation of gas shales: they’ re all the same—right?［R］. SPE 106070, 2007.
    ［4］OMKAR Jaripatke, BILL Grieser, CHONG K K, et al. A completions roadmap to shale-play development: a review of successful approaches toward shale-play stimulation in the last two decades［R］. SPE 130369, 2010.
    ［5］MUTALIK P N, BOB Gibson, TULSA, et al. Case history of sequential and simultaneous fracturing of the barnett shale in parker county［R］. SPE 116124. 2008.
    ［6］VASSILELLIS G D, LI C, SEAGER R, et al. Investigating the expected long-term production performance of shale reservoirs［R］. SPE 138134, 2010.
    ［7］MAXWELL S C, URBANCICT I, STEINSBERGER N, et al. Microseismic imaging of hydraulic fracture complexity in the barnett shal［R］. SPE 77440, 2002.
    ［8］FISHER M K, WRIGHT C A, DAVIDSON B M, et al. Integrating fracture mapping technologies to optimize stimulations in the barnett shale［R］. SPE 77441, 2002.
    ［9］FISHER M K, HEINZE J R, HARRIS C D, et al. Optimizing horizontal completion techniques in the barnett shale using microseismic fracture mapping［R］. SPE 90051, 2004.
    ［10］MAYERHOFER M J, LOLON E P, YOUNGBLOOD J E, et al. Integration of microseismic fracture mapping results with numerical fracture network production modeling in the barnett shale［R］. SPE 102103, 2006.
    ［11］MAXWELL S C, WALTMAN C K,WARPINSKI N R, et al. Imaging seismic deformation induced by hydraulic fracture complexity［R］. SPE 102801, 2006.
    ［12］MAYERHOFER M J, LOLON E P, WARPINSKI N R, et al. What is Stimulated Reservoir Volume（SRV）?［R］. SPE 119890, 2008.
    ［13］CIPOLLA C L, LOLON E P, DZUBIN B.Evaluating stimulation effectiveness in unconventional gas reservoirs［R］. SPE 124843, 2009.
    ［14］CHIPPERFIELDS T, WONG J R, WARNER D S, et al. Shear dilation diagnostics: a new approach for evaluating tight gas stimulation treatments［R］. SPE 106289, 2007.
    ［15］RICK Rickman, MIKE Mullen, ERIK Petre, et al. A practical use of shale petrophysics for stimulation design optimization: all shale plays are not clones of the barnett shale［R］. SPE 115258, 2008.
    ［16］GALE J, HOLDER J. Natural fractures in shales and their importance for gas production［C］. Tectonics Studies Group Annual Meeting, La Roche-en-Ardenne, Belgium, 2008-01.
    ［17］DON Smith, PHILLIP Starr. Method to pump bridge/frac plugs at reduced fluid rate［R］. SPE 112377, 2008．
    ［18］CIPOLLA C L, WARPINSKI N R, MAYERHOFER M J, et al. The relationship between fracture complexity, reservoir properties, and fracture-treatment design［R］. SPE 115769, 2008.
    ［19］NEIL Buffington, JUSTIN Kellner, JAMES G. King, et al. New technology in the bakken play increas the numbe of stages in packer/sleeve completions［R］.SPE 133540, 2010.
    ［20］ZARGARI S, MOHAGHEGH S D. Field development strategies for bakken shale formation［R］. SPE 139032, 2010.
    ［21］张杰，徐安建，李翠楠，等.泥页岩水化对气井钻井井壁稳定性影响规律研究［J］.石油钻采工艺，2008，30（2）：10-12.
  • [1] 任千秋, 林然, 赵金洲, 吴建发, 宋毅.  基于初次压裂地质工程条件及改造效果的页岩气井重复压裂选井模型 . 石油钻采工艺, 2023, 45(2): 223-228, 243. doi: 10.13639/j.odpt.2023.02.014
    [2] 王晓明, 陈军斌, 孙晨, 柳文欣.  致密储层人工裂缝与天然裂缝夹角对水驱油效果的影响 . 石油钻采工艺, 2022, 44(1): 70-76. doi: 10.13639/j.odpt.2022.01.013
    [3] 李牧.  下倾型页岩气水平井连续油管排水采气工艺 . 石油钻采工艺, 2020, 42(3): 329-333. doi: 10.13639/j.odpt.2020.03.013
    [4] 陈雷, 陈会年, 张林海, 刘广海, 陶谦, 刘仍光.  JY页岩气田水平井预防环空带压固井技术 . 石油钻采工艺, 2019, 41(2): 152-159. doi: 10.13639/j.odpt.2019.02.006
    [5] 李凡华, 乔磊, 田中兰, 孙清华, 杜卫强, 付盼.  威远页岩气水平井压裂套变原因分析 . 石油钻采工艺, 2019, 41(6): 734-738. doi: 10.13639/j.odpt.2019.06.010
    [6] 谭锐, 徐旺, 张勇, 张航宇, 林海, 牛增前.  长宁页岩气示范区H-x平台体积压裂技术 . 石油钻采工艺, 2019, 41(1): 116-120. doi: 10.13639/j.odpt.2019.01.018
    [7] 许得禄, 魏拓, 张辞, 曾诚, 景江, 吴殿荣.  MaHW6004井泵送桥塞射孔联作复杂情况处理 . 石油钻采工艺, 2018, 40(3): 306-310. doi: 10.13639/j.odpt.2018.03.006
    [8] 时贤, 程远方, 常鑫, 许洪星, 吴百烈, 蒋恕.  页岩气水平井段内多簇裂缝同步扩展模型建立与应用 . 石油钻采工艺, 2018, 40(2): 247-252. doi: 10.13639/j.odpt.2018.02.018
    [9] 李亚南, 于占淼.  涪陵页岩气田二期水平井钻井防碰绕障技术 . 石油钻采工艺, 2017, 39(3): 303-306. doi: 10.13639/j.odpt.2017.03.009
    [10] 侯腾飞, 张士诚, 马新仿, 李栋, 孙延安.  支撑剂沉降规律对页岩气压裂水平井产能的影响 . 石油钻采工艺, 2017, 39(5): 638-645. doi: 10.13639/j.odpt.2017.05.019
    [11] 李忠厚, 吴小斌, DUZhongwei, 任茜莹.  基于分形理论的页岩气分支水平井产能数学模型 . 石油钻采工艺, 2017, 39(1): 7-13. doi: 10.13639/j.odpt.2017.01.002
    [12] 高彦峰, 赵文帅.  FEWD 地质导向技术在深层页岩气水平井中的应用 . 石油钻采工艺, 2016, 38(4): 427-431. doi: 10.13639/j.odpt.2016.04.004
    [13] 郭小哲, 周长沙.  基于滑脱的页岩气藏压裂水平井渗流模型及产能预测 . 石油钻采工艺, 2015, 37(3): 61-65. doi: 10.13639/j.odpt.2015.03.014
    [14] 刘忠飞, 何世明, 全家正, 周回生, 丁俊选.  川西首口页岩气水平井钻井技术 . 石油钻采工艺, 2014, 36(1): 18-21.
    [15] 冯虎, 徐志强.  塔里木油田克深区块致密砂岩气藏的储层改造技术 . 石油钻采工艺, 2014, 36(5): 93-96. doi: 10.13639/j.odpt.2014.05.022
    [16] 刘祖林, 杨保军, 曾雨辰.  页岩气水平井泵送桥塞射孔联作常见问题及对策 . 石油钻采工艺, 2014, 36(3): 75-78. doi: 10.13639/j.odpt.2014.03.019
    [17] 曾雨辰, 杨保军.  页岩气水平井大型压裂设备配套及应用　　 . 石油钻采工艺, 2013, 35(6): 78-82.
    [18] 刘晓华, 邹春梅, 姜艳东, 翟振宇.  页岩气水平井动态评价方法　　 . 石油钻采工艺, 2013, 35(3): 55-58.
    [19] 任勇, 叶登胜, 李剑秋, 蒋海.  易钻桥塞射孔联作技术在水平井分段压裂中的实践　　 . 石油钻采工艺, 2013, 35(2): 86-90.
    [20] 曾雨辰, 杨保军, 王凌冰.  涪页HF-1井泵送易钻桥塞分段大型压裂技术　　 . 石油钻采工艺, 2012, 34(5): 75-80.
  • 加载中
WeChat 点击查看大图
计量
  • 文章访问数:  5524
  • HTML全文浏览量:  72
  • PDF下载量:  261
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2019-05-22
  • 修回日期:  2019-05-22
  • 刊出日期:  2011-05-18

美国页岩气体积改造技术现状及对我国的启示

  • 1. 中国石油勘探与生产分公司，北京　100007
  • 2. CNPC油气藏改造重点实验室，河北廊坊　065007
  • 3. 中国石油勘探开发研究院廊坊分院，河北廊坊　065007
  • 收稿日期: 2019-05-22
  • 修回日期: 2019-05-22
  • 刊出日期: 2011-05-18

  • 中图分类号: TE357.12

摘要: 概述了美国页岩气改造技术发展历程，对微地震技术推动页岩气改造技术的进步进行了综述，对国外提出的油藏改造体积概念进行了技术定义，分析了体积改造技术的内涵及作用。对实现体积改造的储层条件、天然裂缝的影响及起裂特征等进行了分析，总结出实现体积改造的关键技术以及对我国页岩气改造技术发展的启示。对比了火山岩、碳酸盐岩等天然裂缝发育储层的常规改造与体积改造的不同理念，并提出了页岩气储层改造技术未来发展方向。

English Abstract

吴奇, 胥云, 刘玉章, 丁云宏, 王晓泉, 王腾飞. 美国页岩气体积改造技术现状及对我国的启示[J]. 石油钻采工艺, 2011, 33(2): 1-7.
引用本文: 吴奇, 胥云, 刘玉章, 丁云宏, 王晓泉, 王腾飞. 美国页岩气体积改造技术现状及对我国的启示[J]. 石油钻采工艺, 2011, 33(2): 1-7.
shu
WU Qi, XU Yun, LIU Yuzhang, DING Yunhong, WANG Xiaoquan, WANG Tengfei. The current situation of stimulated reservoir volume for shale in U.S. and its inspiration to China[J]. Oil Drilling & Production Technology, 2011, 33(2): 1-7.
Citation: WU Qi, XU Yun, LIU Yuzhang, DING Yunhong, WANG Xiaoquan, WANG Tengfei. The current situation of stimulated reservoir volume for shale in U.S. and its inspiration to China[J]. Oil Drilling & Production Technology, 2011, 33(2): 1-7.
shu

    全文HTML

参考文献 (1)

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回

    Copyright © 2018 《 石油钻采工艺 》 All Rights Reserved.冀ICP备09022885号-1

    通信地址: 河北省任丘市华北油田采油工程研究院邮政编码: 062552

    电话: 0317-2723370, 2724207传真: 0317-2724207Email: syzc@vip.163.com

    本系统由北京仁和汇智信息技术有限公司设计开发  技术支持:  info@rhhz.net   百度统计