张立侠, 郭春秋. 基于BWRS状态方程的天然气偏差因子计算方法[J]. 石油钻采工艺, 2018, 40(6): 775-781. DOI: 10.13639/j.odpt.2018.06.016
引用本文: 张立侠, 郭春秋. 基于BWRS状态方程的天然气偏差因子计算方法[J]. 石油钻采工艺, 2018, 40(6): 775-781. DOI: 10.13639/j.odpt.2018.06.016
ZHANG Lixia, GUO Chunqiu. A calculation method for Z-factor of natural gas based on BWRS equation[J]. Oil Drilling & Production Technology, 2018, 40(6): 775-781. DOI: 10.13639/j.odpt.2018.06.016
Citation: ZHANG Lixia, GUO Chunqiu. A calculation method for Z-factor of natural gas based on BWRS equation[J]. Oil Drilling & Production Technology, 2018, 40(6): 775-781. DOI: 10.13639/j.odpt.2018.06.016

基于BWRS状态方程的天然气偏差因子计算方法

A calculation method for Z-factor of natural gas based on BWRS equation

  • 摘要: 天然气偏差因子是油气藏工程计算中的必要参数,在油气勘探开发的诸多工程应用中起着重要作用。基于Starling修正的Benedict-Webb-Rubin状态方程(BWRS方程)和DAK方法,对BWRS方程中的指数项进行修正,利用非线性回归分析,提出了一种新的偏差因子计算方法,利用偏差因子标准数据对DAK、胡建国修正的DAK方法及该新方法进行了对比。误差分析结果表明:对于一般的温度压力范围(1.05≤Tpr≤3.0 & 0.2≤ppr≤15)和相对高压(1.4≤Tpr≤2.8 & 15≤ppr≤30)的情形(共7 148组天然气偏差因子数据),新方法的平均绝对误差分别为0.382%和0.205%,比DAK方法和胡建国修正的DAK方法的计算精度都要高。相对而言,DAK方法在“1.1≤Tpr≤3.0 & 0.2≤ppr≤15”范围内的计算精度较高,胡建国修正的DAK方法只能用于相对高压(1.4≤Tpr≤2.8 & 15≤ppr≤30)的情形,而新方法适用范围更大(1.05<Tpr≤3.0 & 0.2≤ppr≤15以及1.4≤Tpr≤2.8 & 15≤ppr≤30)且计算效果更好。

     

    Abstract: Z-factor of natural gas is a necessary parameter in the calculation of reservoir engineering, and plays an important role in many engineering applications of oil and gas exploration and development. The exponential term in BWRS equation was modified based on the BWR equation modified by Starling and the DAK method. Then, a new Z-factor calculation method was developed by means of non-linear regression analysis. Finally, the DAK method, the DAK method modified by HU Jianguo and the new method were compared by using the standard data of Z-factor. The error analysis results indicate that in the situations with general temperature and pressure range (1.05≤Tpr≤3.0 & 0.2≤ppr≤15) and higher pressure (1.4≤Tpr≤2.8 & 15≤ppr≤30) (7 148 Z-factors of natural gas), the average absolute error of the new method is 0.382% and 0.205%, respectively, which are higher than the calculation accuracy of the DAK method and the DAK method modified by HU Jianguo. Comparatively, DAK method has higher calculation accuracy when pressure and temperature is in range of 1.1≤Tpr≤3.0 & 0.2≤ppr≤15, the DAK method modified by HU Jianguo is only applicable to higher pressure(1.4≤Tpr≤2.8 & 15≤ppr≤30), and the new method has wider applicable range (1.05 < Tpr≤3.0 & 0.2≤ppr≤15以及1.4≤Tpr≤2.8 & 15≤ppr≤30) with higher calculation accuracy.

     

/

返回文章
返回